Report attacks official guidance on low-fat diets

The researchers say: However, they say eating lots of foods that raise blood glucose and promote the release of insulin are factors likely to increase this risk — and high carbohydrates do just that.

What does the report say? It summarises the recommendations of the current Eatwell Guide for healthy eating, saying it has three main concerns with this guidance: The report is said to follow decades of work and experience that founding and advisory board members have gathered through working with thousands of patients to improve their health.

That doesn't seem to be the case in this instance.

Report attacks official guidance on low-fat diets

The report is presented in the form of a narrative, where individual pieces of evidence are cited as coming from particular studies. Other studies presenting contradictory findings do not seem to have been included, they say. It is unclear where Public Health Collaboration's funding comes from.

We also don't know, for example, whether the recommendations on fat and carbohydrate intake would be applicable to all stages in life, or whether there might be different advice for children.

But it's not known what sort of experience or data from patients has contributed to informing this. The Public Health Collaboration concludes the UK should stop recommending the avoidance of high saturated fat foods and focus on consuming food in its natural form — however much saturated fat it contains.

For example, they recommend natural oils and butter, including coconut oil, ghee, lard and cold-pressed olive oil — the "fake" ones are rapeseed, sunflower and corn oil — and no juices or processed sugar products.

Such foods are usually in their natural form. What response has there been to the report? But, emotional responses aside, there is no hard evidence to support many of the alleged benefits of so-called "real food".

Such foods are usually in their natural form. The report is presented in the form of a narrative, where individual pieces of evidence are cited to particular studies.

However, many are observational. As a scientist from the University of Reading says: However, they say eating lots of foods that raise blood glucose and promote the release of insulin are factors likely to increase this risk — and high carbohydrates do just that.

Also, without reviewing the individual studies referenced, it is not possible to appraise the quality and strength of this evidence. The report suggests it doesn't matter how much saturated fat we eat, and doesn't recommend counting calories.

Other opinion is more mixed, with one professor saying the report has "good, bad and ugly elements in it". This includes research from the University of Cambridge, saying current evidence does not support the recommendations to eat high polyunsaturated fats and low saturated fats.

The standard warnings about cherry-picking — evidence that is inconvenient may be ignored — apply.

Official advice on low-fat diet and cholesterol is wrong, says health charity

However, this does not prove that the guidelines are to blame. As such, it is not possible to say this was a systematic reviewand we cannot know for sure this is a balanced report that has reviewed all evidence relevant to diet and nutrition.

But it's not known what sort of experience or data from patients has contributed to informing this. Other opinion is more mixed, with one professor saying the report has "good, bad and ugly elements in it".

However, this does not prove that the guidelines are to blame. They suggest that such recommendations are behind the increase in rates of type 2 diabetes and obesity.

The report is said to follow decades of work and experience that founding and advisory board members have gathered through working with thousands of patients to improve their health.The 24 schools in Scotland with the lowest rate for getting pupils into work, training or further study.

"Low-fat diet bad for your health and cutting back on meat, dairy and eggs a disastrous mistake," the Daily Mirror reports. That is the main message of a controversial report attacking official UK guidelines on diet and weight loss.

· "Low-fat diet bad for your health and cutting back on meat, dairy and eggs a disastrous mistake," the Daily Mirror reports.

NHS website - Report attacks official guidance on low-fat diets

That is the main message of a controversial report attacking official UK guidelines on diet and weight laurallongley.comon: Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD. Official advice on low-fat diet and cholesterol is wrong, says health charity This article is more than 2 years old Report accuses UK public health bodies of colluding with food industry and calls Author: Press Association.

“Low-fat diet bad for your health and cutting back on meat, dairy and eggs a disastrous mistake,” the Daily Mirror reports. Report attacks official guidance on low-fat diets. Published: Sunday 22 May Share this article. Sign Up To Our Daily Newsletter Sign up.

Alert issued over man wanted in connection with.

Report attacks official guidance on low-fat diets
Rated 3/5 based on 41 review